![]() |
RSS Feed | View by: Most Recent | Most Popular | Most Discussed |
Indemnity costs cut for non-surgical cosmetic treatment
18th Mar 2010|
Dental Protection has announced that, with effect from April 2010, the use of injectable, non-permanent cosmetic procedures can be indemnified within normal subscription categories at no additional cost, subject to certain conditions. The procedures are botulinium toxin and non-permanent dermal fillers in any part of the face (but excluding the neck). Previously, it was necessary either to transfer to a dental cosmetic membership category at significantly higher subscriptions, or to buy a separate indemnity for these cosmetic procedures from a third party (usually a commercial insurance provider) at an additional cost. The decision coincides with the Shared Regulation scheme agreed between the GMC, GDC and Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), and the Independent Healthcare Advisory Services (IHAS). IHAS has recently announced the imminent launch of a third party (voluntary) Registration and Inspection Scheme for providers of these procedures, incorporating the IHAS Quality Mark which is designed to demonstrate to patients and third parties that the provider has received appropriate training in the use of these procedures, and is committed to the Standards for Cosmetic Injectables under the auspices of IHAS. The new scheme includes the inspection of the facilities in which these procedures are to be provided. Caspe Healthcare Knowledge Systems (CHKS) is to be the third party registration, quality assurance and inspection agency. The conditions under which these procedures can be indemnified by Dental Protection within normal subscription categories and rates are: • The member must be registered with CHKS under the forthcoming IHAS scheme and possess the IHAS Quality Mark once the scheme has launched. The existing dental cosmetic categories remain available for: 'Members who have been properly trained in these procedures and who adhere to the new Standards for Cosmetic Injectables will, we believe, no more of a risk when carrying out these procedures than when they are providing many other types of dental care and treatment. 'These changes are consistent with Dental Protection's strong commitment to fairness in our approach to subscription setting.' Further information and a revised position statement is available. Click here. |

| Comments (posted immediately - see terms & conditions) |


